nav emailalert searchbtn searchbox tablepage yinyongbenwen piczone journalimg journalInfo searchdiv qikanlogo popupnotification paper paperNew
2024, 06, v.26 605-609
心肌代谢显像评价老年患者心室不同部位起搏的心室机械不同步性
基金项目(Foundation): 上海市闵行区自然科学研究课题(2022MHZ041)
邮箱(Email): 18918168629@163.com;
DOI:
摘要:

目的 应用心肌代谢显像评价心室不同部位起搏对左心室机械不同步性的影响。方法 选择2023年1~11月复旦大学附属上海市第五人民医院行永久起搏器置入术的老年患者56例,随机分为左束支区域起搏(LBBAP)组和右心室起搏(RVP)组,各组28例,另选取28例未行起搏器置入术的老年患者作为对照组。起搏器置入术后1周内行18F-氟代脱氧葡萄糖(18F-FDG)正电子发射断层显像(PET)/CT心肌代谢显像,进行PET心肌代谢影像分析和左心室机械同步性评价。结果 对照组患者左心室射血分数(LVEF)显著高于LBBAP组和RVP组[(67.68±9.61)%vs(62.71±11.33)%vs(57.36±16.07)%,P=0.012];LBBAP组与RVP组LVEF比较无显著差异(P>0.05)。与RVP组比较,LBBAP组角度标准差(PSD)、相位带宽、熵、室壁运动总评分(SMS)、室壁增厚总评分(STS)、室壁运动异常范围占中段心肌表面积的百分比(Mot Ext)、室壁增厚异常范围占中段心肌表面积的百分比(Thk Ext)显著降低,差异有统计学意义(P<0.01)。LBBAP组与对照组PSD、相位带宽、熵、SMS、STS、Mot Ext、Thk Ext等比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论 18F-FDG PET/CT心肌代谢显像对心室不同部位起搏进行左心室机械同步性评价显示,LBBAP左心室同步性参数优于RVP,与对照组相近。

Abstract:

Objective To evaluate the effect of pacing in different parts of the ventricle on left ventricular mechanical asynchrony using myocardial metabolic imaging.Methods A total of 56 elderly patients undergoing permanent pacemaker implantation in our hospital from January to November 2023 were recruited and randomly divided into left bundle branch pacing(LBBAP) group and right ventricular pacing(RVP) group, with 28 patients in each group.Another 28 elderly patients who did not undergo pacemaker implantation surgery were selected as the control group.Within 1 week after pacemaker implantation, 18F fluorodeoxyglucose(18F-FDG) positron emission tomography(PET)/CT myocardial metabolism imaging was performed to analyze PET myocardial metabolism images and evaluate left ventricular mechanical synchrony.Results The LVEF was significantly higher in the control group than the LBBAP group and RVP group [(67.68±9.61)% vs(62.71±11.33)% vs(57.36±16.07)%,P=0.012],but no such difference was seen between the LBBAP group and the RVAP group(P>0.05).The LBBAP group had obviously lower pattern standard deviation(PSD),phase histogram bandwidth(PHBW),entropy, summed motion score(SMS),summed thickening score(STS),extent of abnormal motion(Mot Ext) and thickening extent(Thk Ext) when compared with the RVP group(P<0.01).There were no statistical significant differences in the terms of PSD,PHBW,Entropy, SMS,STS,Mot Ext, and Thk Ext between the LBBAP group and the control group(P>0.05).Conclusion 18F-FDG PET/CT myocardial metabolic imaging can be used to evaluate left ventricular mechanical synchrony in pacing different parts of the ventricle, and LBBAP can obtain better left ventricular synchrony parameters than RVP,similar to the control group.

参考文献

[1]Chen K,Li Y,Dai Y,et al.Comparison of electrocardiogram characteristics and pacing parameters between left bundle branch pacing and right ventricular pacing in patients receiving pacemaker therapy[J].Europace,2019,21(4):673-680.DOI:10.1093/europace/euy252.

[2] Zhang J,Wang Z,Cheng L,et al. Immediate clinical outcomes of left bundle branch area pacing vs conventional right ventricular pacing[J].Clin Cardiol,2019,42(8):768-773.DOI:10.1002/clc.23215.

[3]Cai B,Huang X,Li L,et al.Evaluation of cardiac synchrony inleft bundle branch pacing:insights from echocardiographic research[J].J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol,2020,31(2):560-569.DOI:10.1111/jce.14342.

[4]Wu S,Su L,Vijayaraman P,et al.Left bundle branch pacing for cardiac resynchronization therapy:nonrandomized ontreatment comparison with His bundle pacing and biventricular pacing[J].Can J Cardiol,2021,37(2):319-328. DOI:10.1016/j.cjca.2020.04.037.

[5]Li X,Qiu C,Xie R,et al.Left bundle branch area pacing delivery of cardiac resynchronization therapy and comparison with biventricular pacing[J.ESC Heart Fail, 2020,7(4):1711-1722.DOI:10.1002/ehf2.12731.

[6]时向民,李健,李世兴,等.左束支优化心脏再同步治疗对老年心力衰竭患者心功能的影响[J].中华老年心脑血管病杂志,2022,24(3):255-259.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1009-0126.2022.03.009.

[7]Vijayaraman P,Canoó,Koruth JS,et al. His-purkinje conduction system pacing following transcatheter aortic valve replacement:feasibility and safety[J].JACCClin Electrophysiol,2020,6(6):649-657.DOI:10.1016/j.jacep.2020.02.010.

[8]Wang C,Shi J,Ge J,et al.Left ventricular systolic and diastolic dyssynchrony to improve cardiac resynchronization therapy response in heart failure patients with dilated cardiomyopathy[J].J Nucl Cardiol,2021,28(3):1023-1036.DOI:10.1007/s12350-020-02132-1.

[9]Wang C,Tang H,Zhu F,et al. Prognostic value of leftventricular systolic and diastolic dyssynchrony measured from gated SPECT MPI in patients with dilated cardiomyopathy[J].J Nucl Cardiol,2020,27(5):1582-1591.DOI:10.1007/s12350-018-01468-z.

[10]Bazzy J,Gadiyaram V,Nguyen BJ,et al.Gated single-photon emission computed tomography myocardial perfusion imaging phase analysis as an imaging biomarker for mortality prediction in heart failure patients undergoing cardiac resynchronization therapy[J].Nucl Med Commun,2021,42(9):990-997.DOI:10.1097/MNM.0000000000001426

[11]He Z,Li D,Cui C,et al.Predictive values of left ventricular mechanical dyssynchrony for CRT response in heart failure patients with different pathophysiology[J].JNucl Cardiol,2022,29(5):2637-2648.DOI:10.1007/s12350-021-02796-3.

[12]Hou X,Qian Z,Wang Y,et al. Feasibility and cardiac synchrony of permanent left bundle branch pacing through the interventricular septum[J].Europace,2019,21(11):1694-1702.DOI:10.1093/europace/euz188.

[13]Qian Z,Wang Y,Hou X,et al.A pilot study to determine if left ventricular activation time is a useful parameter for left bundle branch capture:validated by ventricular mechanical synchrony with SPECT imaging[J].J Nucl Cardiol,2021,28(3):1153-1161.DOI:10.1007/s12350-020-02111-6.

[14]Degtiarova G,Claus P,Duchenne J,et al.Low septal to lateral wall~(18)F-FDG ratio is highly associated with mechanical dyssynchrony in non-ischemic.CRT candidates[J].EJNMMI Res,2019,9(1):105,DOI:10.1186/s1186/s13550-O19-5p75-9.

[15]Degtiarova G,Claus P,Duchenne J,et al.Left ventricular regional glucose metabolism in combination with septal scar extent identifies CRT responders[J].Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging,2021,48(8):2437-2446.DOI:10.1007/s00259-020-05161-7.

[16]Mirolo A,Chaumont C,Auquier N,et al.Left bundle branch area pacing in patients with baseline narrow,left,or right bundle branch block QRS patterns:insights into electrocardiographic and echocardiographic features[J].Eurpace,2023,25(2):526-535.DOI:10.1093/europace/euac223.

[17]Mei Y,Han R,Cheng L,et al.Assessment of cardiac function and ventricular mechanical synchronization in left bundle branch area pacing by speckle tracking and three-dimensional echo cardiography[J].Am J Cardiol,2023,197:1-9.DOI:10.1016/j.amkjcard.2022.10.012.

[18]Sun Z,Di B,Gao H,et al.Assessment of ventricular mechanical synchronization after left bundle branch pacing using 2-D speckle tracking echocardiography[J].Clin Cardiol,2020,43(12):1562-1572.DOI:10.1002/clc.23481.

[19]Miyajima K,Urushida T,Tamura T,et al.Assessing cardiac mechanical dyssynchrony in left bundle branch area pacing and right ventricular septal pacing using myocardial perfusion scintigraphy in the acute phase of pacemaker implantation[J].J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol,2022,33(8):1826-1836.DOI:10.1111/jce.15609.

[20]Miyajima K,Urushida T,Tomida Y,et al.Comparison of the left ventri cular dyssynchrony between stylet-driven and lumen-less lead technique in left bundle branch area pacing using myocardial perfusion scintigraphy[J].Quant Imaging Med Surg,2023,13(10):6840-6853.DOI:10.21037/qims-23-357.

基本信息:

DOI:

中图分类号:R541.7

引用信息:

[1]孙晓琰,夏凯伦,顾祯祺等.心肌代谢显像评价老年患者心室不同部位起搏的心室机械不同步性[J].中华老年心脑血管病杂志,2024,26(06):605-609.

基金信息:

上海市闵行区自然科学研究课题(2022MHZ041)

检 索 高级检索

引用

GB/T 7714-2015 格式引文
MLA格式引文
APA格式引文